next up previous contents
Next: Discussion Up: Results Previous: Library Complementarity and Similarity   Contents

Global Diversity


Table 3.4: Estimated and observed global transcript diversity in M. truncatula root libraries. Global diversity ($S_{\gamma}$) is computed as the product of local (or alpha) and beta diversity ( $S_{\alpha} S_{\beta}$), summed over all libraries. Local diversity ($S_{\alpha}$) is the product of library diversity and the proportion of plant transcripts within a library, $P_{plant}$. Beta diversity is the mean complementarity compared with all other libraries, $\overline{C}$. Observed global diversity ($S_{net}$) is calculated in the same manner as $S_{\gamma}$, but substitutes observed local diversity ($S_{obs}$) for estimated ($\hat{S}$) in computing $S_{\alpha}$. Only diversity values from the 50% identity threshold are shown. Also shown are subtotals that exclude NF libraries from global diversity calculations.
LIBRARY $\hat{S}$ $P_{plant}$ $\overline{C}$ $S_{\alpha} S_{\beta}$ $S_{obs}$ $S_{tot}$
MHAM 9053 0.773 0.918 6421 2311 1640
DSIR 8124 0.959 0.915 7130 1765 1549
KV0 8797 0.992 0.922 8047 1963 1795
KV3 9979 0.990 0.929 9182 1800 1655
SUBTOTAL $S_{\gamma}=30780$ $S_{net}=6639$
             
NFroot 5554 0.996 0.943 5218 1636 1537
NFnod 9081 0.993 0.919 8287 2094 1911
TOTAL $S_{\gamma}=44285$ $S_{net}=10087$

For a 50% identity threshold, estimated global diversity in the MHAM, DSIR, KV0, and KV3 libraries is 30,780 distinct transcripts (Table 3.4). If we include the NF root and nod libraries, estimated global diversity is 44,285. We note that beta diversity is the greatest unknown in these calculations. As noted above, complementarity calculations are based on observed diversity. Increasing samples should decrease complementarity between libraries, but at an unknown rate [32].

Our calculations for net observed diversity indicate more than 10,000 distinct M. truncatula root transcripts (Table 3.4) have resulted from nearly 15,000 samples analyzed in six different libraries.


next up previous contents
Next: Discussion Up: Results Previous: Library Complementarity and Similarity   Contents
Peter T. Hraber 2001-06-13