Next: In non-immunoglobulin genes, predicted
Up: ANTIBODY REPERTOIRES AND PATHOGEN
Previous: Higher predicted replacement mutability
As mentioned in the previous chapter, the
nature of the somatic hypermutation mechanism is not known. Attempts
to show the involvement of mismatch repair mechanisms, that is, the
mechanisms that recognize and repair base pairs other than
Watson-Crick A-T and G-C, in this process led to ambiguous results
(). There is a sense
though, that an error-prone polymerase might be involved
(1998), or, more generally, that normally expressed gene
products have been recruited in the somatic hypermutation mechanism
(1998). In order to test the involvement of these general
mutation/repair mechanisms in somatic hypermutation, I stated the
following hypothesis. If both:
- more general mutation/repair mechanisms have
been recruited for somatic hypermutation, and
- genes tend to evolve mutational robustness (Wagner, 1999, and
E. van Nimwegen, personal communication, 1999)
then I might be able to detect optimization features with respect to
the somatic mutator in non-immunoglobulin genes. Concretely, in light
of my previous results, I would expect to detect codon usage bias
consistent with low mutability in non-immunoglobulin genes.
In the following sections I will show that such codon bias is indeed
present in a large fraction of the non-immunoglobulin sequences that I
analyzed. It is not a random codon bias that the somatic hypermutation
mechanism happens to reveal; none of 100 other codon biases that I
analyzed produced as many sequences with very low mutability as the
codon bias present in the genome. If non-immunoglobulin genes were to
undergo somatic hypermutation, they would generally have a low
propensity to mutate. A striking finding is that their mutability
would be correlated with the A and T nucleotide composition, and that
this correlation is not entirely observable in the mutability model
that I used. This finding may be a small step towards revealing
the nature of the somatic hypermutation mechanism, that virtually
every laboratory that studies somatic mutation is trying to identify.
Next: In non-immunoglobulin genes, predicted
Up: ANTIBODY REPERTOIRES AND PATHOGEN
Previous: Higher predicted replacement mutability
Mihaela Oprea
1999-04-11