next up previous
Next: Similar mutability pattern in Up: Somatic hypermutation targets the Previous: Contribution of nucleotide composition, VH

Are human V-region sequences optimized for somatic hypermutation?

Previous studies (), as well as the above analysis showed a segregation of the more mutable codons in CDRs, and less mutable ones in framework regions. This property characterizes all human V region sequences (Fig. [*]). This is not to say that human V regions have maximal CDR mutability and minimal FR mutability under somatic hypermutation. I can, in fact, construct the exact nucleotide sequence with this property for any of the V region amino acid sequences. However, as I could not assess the significance of the difference in mutability between the observed and the optimal sequence, I designed instead another approach to look at the degree of optimality of the germline sequence. Namely, I explore the neighborhood of the observed germline sequence in the space of silent mutants. These are the sequences to which evolution had most immediate access. I shall describe the new experiment. I start with a germline sequence, and generate 104 variants of it, each of the variants differing from the germline sequence by n silent mutations. I calculate the predicted CDR and FR replacement mutabilities, and their ratio, for each of the variants. I then determine the rank of the observed, germline, sequence among its variants. Returning to the set of human VH sequences, among the 2 mutation neighbors, the proportion of sequences with higher CDR/FR mutability ratio than the germline sequence varies between 38 and 52 percent. Among 10 mutation neighbors, this proportion varies more widely, 25-65%. Among the 50 mutation neighbors, for some germline sequence we find as few as 4% variants with higher ratio, whereas for some other sequence, this proportion is 98.5%. Thus, the germline sequences are far from being optimal with respect to the differential mutability CDR/FR. It is a different issue whether the selection pressure to select for a higher ratio is sufficiently high. For the 2 mutation neighbors, the CDR/FR mutability ratio changes by fractions of a percent, and only for 10 mutation neighbors do we reach the level of percentages of the germline ratio. My conclusion is therefore that, although all human VH sequences are characterized by lower FR than CDR replacement mutability per nucleotide, the mutability of individual sequences is quite far from optimal.

 
Table 3.2: Normalized rank of the ratio between the predicted average CDR and FR mutability of observed germline sequences among their 2-, 10- and 50-mutant neighbors.
Gene 2 mutation neighbors   10 mutation neighbors   50 mutation neighbors  
human VH1 genes  
IGHV1-18 0.541   0.532   0.565  
IGHV1-2 0.535   0.449   0.261  
IGHV1-24 0.599   0.71   0.867  
IGHV1-30 0.527   0.505   0.404  
IGHV1-45 0.519   0.459   0.226  
IGHV1-46 0.529   0.505   0.449  
IGHV1-58 0.52   0.495   0.434  
IGHV1-69 0.561   0.593   0.726  
IGHV1-8 0.501   0.348   0.069  
IGHV1-f 0.544   0.562   0.608  
human VH2 genes  
IGHV2-26 0.624   0.752   0.956  
IGHV2-50 0.601   0.639   0.796  
IGHV2-70 0.641   0.751   0.951  
human VH3 genes  
IGHV3-11 0.525   0.476   0.404  
IGHV3-13 0.483   0.447   0.295  
IGHV3-15 0.496   0.477   0.377  
IGHV3-16 0.514   0.36   0.095  
IGHV3-19 0.487   0.359   0.076  
IGHV3-20 0.572   0.59   0.583  
IGHV3-21 0.503   0.495   0.471  
IGHV3-23 0.507   0.477   0.382  
IGHV3-30 0.551   0.558   0.714  
IGHV3-30.3 0.565   0.627   0.801  
IGHV3-33 0.56   0.589   0.702  
 


 
Table 3.2: Normalized rank of the ratio between the predicted average CDR and FR mutability of observed germline sequences among their 2-, 10- and 50-mutant neighbors (continued).
Gene 2 mutation neighbors   10 mutation neighbors   50 mutation neighbors  
IGHV3-35 0.506   0.383   0.122  
IGHV3-38 0.501   0.472   0.337  
IGHV3-43 0.564   0.606   0.687  
IGHV3-47 0.566   0.638   0.882  
IGHV3-48 0.494   0.478   0.457  
IGHV3-49 0.526   0.586   0.659  
IGHV3-53 0.552   0.556   0.569  
IGHV3-64 0.488   0.438   0.31  
IGHV3-66 0.533   0.528   0.505  
IGHV3-7 0.547   0.55   0.616  
IGHV3-72 0.542   0.573   0.66  
IGHV3-73 0.585   0.61   0.686  
IGHV3-74 0.52   0.554   0.648  
IGHV3-9 0.576   0.629   0.778  
IGHV3-d 0.482   0.418   0.226  
human VH4 genes  
IGHV4-28 0.557   0.495   0.444  
IGHV4-301-4-31 0.531   0.455   0.322  
IGHV4-302 0.535   0.477   0.359  
IGHV4-304 0.573   0.549   0.584  
IGHV4-31 0.519   0.438   0.306  
IGHV4-34 0.616   0.606   0.696  
IGHV4-39 0.547   0.546   0.612  
IGHV4-4 0.607   0.616   0.756  
IGHV4-59 0.574   0.545   0.562  
IGHV4-61 0.597   0.574   0.671  
IGHV4-b 0.582   0.594   0.737  
human VH5 genes  
IGHV5-51 0.583   0.701   0.954  
IGHV5-a 0.598   0.705   0.938  
human VH6 gene  
IGHV6-1 0.55   0.625   0.804  
human VH7 genes  
IGHV7-41 0.586   0.53   0.419  
IGHV7-81 0.446   0.274   0.015  


next up previous
Next: Similar mutability pattern in Up: Somatic hypermutation targets the Previous: Contribution of nucleotide composition, VH
Mihaela Oprea
1999-04-11